Dismissed

Thirunavukarasu v. State Rep by

Madras HC20 Feb 2023CRL OP/33246/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition filed to quash an FIR as infructuous. The Government Advocate submitted that the related charge sheet was already filed, leaving no material for further adjudication. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition was dismissed as infructuous; the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.

Thirunavukarasu Vs State Rep by — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.33246 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 20.02.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.33246 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.18341 of 2019

Thirunavukarasu

...Petitioner

Vs.

State rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Kunnam P.S. Perambalur D.T.

¶11

Cr.No.257 of 2019

¶12

Sellammal

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Crime No.257 of 2019 dated 13.09.2019 on the file of the 1^st respondent Kunnam Police Station, Perambalur and quash the same.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Sangamithirai

¶16

For 1^st Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the FIR in Crime No. 257 of 2019 dated 13.09.2019 on the file of the 1^st respondent Police.

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Crl.O.P.No.33246 of 2019

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions,

¶23

would submit that it is a case in counter. Two FIRs in Crime No.256 of 2019 and Crime No.257 of 2019 have been registered on the complaint given by two opposite parties with regard to the same occurrence. In both the cases, investigation has been completed and final report has been filed before the Judicial Magistrate II, Perambalur. However, C.C.No.393 of 2019 has been assigned with regard to Crime No.256 of 2019 and the charge sheet filed in Crime No.257 of 2019 has not been taken on file.

¶24

In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶25

20.02.2023

¶26

vum Index:yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Crl.O.P.No.33246 of 2019

¶30

¶31

The Inspector of Police, Kunnam P.S. Perambalur D.T.

¶32

The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

Crl.O.P.No.33246 of 2019

¶36

R.N.MANJULA,J.

¶37

vum

¶38

Crl.O.P.No.33246 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.18341 of 2019

¶39

20.02.2023

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Thirunavukarasu v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thirunavukarasu v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Nandhini Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Aruchamy Vs Deputy Superintendent of Police

The Commissioner of Police, Vs Nuttan R.Mehta

M.v.Daniel, M/A.50 Years Vs C.P.Shanmugasundaram, 63 Yrs

Farouk Irani Vs the Reserve Bank of India

K.Govindaraj, M/a 50 Years, Vs G.Sampath