T.Sunil Ross v. S.Esudian
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition challenging an order that refused recall of a witness for cross-examination but granted it for a bank manager, holding no ground for interference.
What did the court decide?
The criminal original petition challenging the order under Section 391 Cr.P.C. was dismissed.
What the court decided
1 of 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P No.30321 of 2022
T.Sunil Ross (M/A-53 years) Proprietor of M/s.Shine Constructions Mno.10, O Block, 35th Street Anna Nagar, Chennai-12.
.. Petitioner/Appellant/Accused
.Vs.
Mr.Esudian Rep.by his Power of Attorney Holder Mr.C.Rajkumar s/o.Chandrasekar Proprietor of M/s.Selvam Hardware's No.2/3, J.J.Nagar East,Chennai-37.
..Respondent/Petitioner/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order in CMP.No.1 of 2022 in C.A.No.17 of 2022, on the file of learned II Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee @ Thiruvallur dated 14.7.2022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's order dismissing an application to recall a witness for cross-examination under Section 391 Cr.PC. and allow it for another witness.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Sunil Ross
- respondent
Mr. Esudian
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court