Court granted leave to file a Criminal Revision against a lower appellate judgment that set aside a conviction under Section 138 NI Act. Registry was directed to number the revision for admission.
Leave to file the Criminal Revision was granted. Registry directed to number the appeal for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.28011 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.34064 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.28011 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.34064 of 2023
M.NIRMAL KUMAR., J.
The petitioner as a complainant filed a private complaint against the
respondent/accused in C.C.No.78 of 2016 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kangayem (trial Court) for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. After ful-fledged trial, the respondent was convicted and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Challenging the same, the respondent/accused preferred an appeal before the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharapuram (lower appellate Court) in Crl.A.No.4 of 2020. The lower appellate Court by judgment, dated 09.02.2023 allowed the appeal setting aside the judgment of the trial Court. Aggrieved over the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present Criminal Revision Case.
Page 1 of 2
Crl.O.P.No.28011 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.34064 of 2023
M.NIRMAL KUMAR., J.
vv2
3.The Registry is directed to number the appeal and post for
admission, if it is otherwise in order.
18.12.2023
vv2
Crl.O.P.No.28011 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.34064 of 2023
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file Criminal Revision must be granted against contrary judgments.
Petitioner/Complainant
Respondent/Accused
M.NIRMAL KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
