Dismissed

R. Govindan v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC26 Apr 2023CRL OP/27484/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners withdrew the Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and directed the police to expedite investigation and file a final report within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; 1st respondent directed to expedite investigation and file final report within eight weeks.

R. Govindan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.27484 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.27484 of 2019

¶7

1.R.Govindan 2.R.Padmanaban 3.K.Nirmala 4.S.Kanaga 5.D.Dhanalakshmi 6.P.Santha

7.R.Rathnabai

...Petitioners

-Vs-

1.The State rep. by: The Inspector of Police, CCB-II, Chennai, Veppery Chennai – 7. (Crime No.98 of 2019) 2.M.S.Pandian

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the First Information Report in Crime No.98 of 2019 on the file of the 1^st respondent and to quash the same.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.27484 of 2019

¶17

For Petitioner	: Mr.P.Raja
For R1	: Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor.
For R2	: Mr.S.Anil Sandeep

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought

¶20

permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and

¶21

he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶22

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Since the Criminal Original Petition is pending before this Court for the past four years, the 1^st respondent is directed to expedite the investigation and file a final report within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

26.04.2023

¶24

smv

¶25

Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.27484 of 2019

¶29

To,

¶30

1.The Inspector of Police, CCB-II, Chennai, Veppery Chennai – 7.

¶31

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/4

¶34

Crl.O.P.No.27484 of 2019

¶35

SUNDER MOHAN,J.

¶36

smv

¶37

Crl.O.P.No.27484 of 2019

¶38

26.04.2023

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

4/4

R. Govindan v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Govindan v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hh Pooyam Thirunal Gowri Parvathi Bai Vs the State of Tamilnadu, Represented by Its

State of Tamil Nadu, Vs D.Kalavani

P.Shanmugam Vs the State Rep by Its

Karthikeyani Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Rajkumar Balsingh Vs State

S.Rajagopal Vs the Inspector of Police