Allowed

Sakthivel v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC11 Dec 2023CRL OP/27391/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC, the High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused in a theft case involving robbery. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and adhere to strict reporting and conduct conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to daily reporting and specific conduct conditions.

Sakthivel Vs the State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.27391 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.27391 of 2023

¶7

Sakthivel

¶8

...Petitioner/Accused

¶9

Vs.

¶10

State represented by The Inspector of Police, R-9, Valasarawakkam Police Station, Valasaravakkam. (Crime No.2826 of 1993) ...Respondent

¶11

PRAYER:

¶12

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.2826 of 1993 on the file of the respondent police on such terms and conditions.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Selvakumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶14

1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.27391 of 2023

¶17

Petitioner is A4 in P.R.C.No.32 of 2023 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee. Originally crime No.2826 of 1993 had been registered under Sections 394, 450, 461 and 397 of I.P.C. The petitioner had been taken into custody on 14.10.2023.

¶18

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 06.10.2023, while the defacto complainant was watching T.V., unknown persons entered a house and broke the bureau and stole money and jewels. Hence, the complaint.

¶19

It is stated that subsequently A1 and A2 had died and A3 had

¶20

been taken into custody and the petitioner herein had moved a bail application before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur in Crl.M.P.No.5449 of 2023 and the same was dismissed on 21.11.2023.

¶21

3.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶22

I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following

¶23

conditions:

¶24

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Crl.O.P.No.27391 of 2023

¶26

4.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/ - (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee, and on further conditions that: -

¶27

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶28

[b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee on everyday at 10.30 a.m., with respect to P.R.C.No.32 of 2023 till the date of the committal and thereafter, again before the learned Sessions Court on daily at 10.30a.m., till the completion of the trial.

¶29

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶30

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶31

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the

¶32

3/5

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Crl.O.P.No.27391 of 2023

¶35

petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶36

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh

¶37

FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

11.12.2023

nvi