Dismissed

Senthilkumar v. State Rep by

Madras HC16 Nov 2023CRL OP/27311/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC was filed to quash a charge sheet alleging offences of cheating, assault on women, and insult to modesty involving sexual intercourse and failure to marry. The court dismissed the petition without detailed reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the criminal case charge sheet was dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition was also dismissed.

Senthilkumar Vs State Rep by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.27311 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 16.11.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.27311 of 2022

¶7

and

¶8

Crl.M.P.No.16810 of 2022

1.Senthil Kumar

2.Boominathan

... Petitioners

-vs-

1.The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, W-1, All Women Police Station, Thousand Lights, Chennai. (Crime No.9 of 2019)

¶14

2.Selvi Sailakshmi ...Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in S.C.No.295 of 2022 on the file of City Civil Court, Sessions Judge (Magalir Neethimandram), Chennai and quash the same as illegal.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Mohammed Abbas For R1 : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Ms.I.Indhuja

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page No.1/2

¶19

Crl.O.P.No.27311 of 2022

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

¶22

This petition is filed to quash the criminal case pending against the petitioners for the alleged offence under Sections 417, 376, 406, 420, 506(i), 294(b) and 109 of IPC.

¶23

Since the first petitioner herein has been arrayed as first accused in the case of cheating the defacto complainant by having sexual intercourse promising to marry her, later failed to marry and threatened and the case of the defacto complainant is that she was impregnated by the first accused who is none other than the brother of the second accused, this petition is dismissed. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

¶24

16.11.2023

¶25

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No rkp To 1.The Sessions Judge (Magalir Neethimandram), Chennai 2.The Inspector of Police, W-1, All Women Police Station, Thousand Lights, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

¶26

Crl.O.P.No.27311 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.16810 of 2022

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Page No.2/2

Senthilkumar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthilkumar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Sandhiya Vs The Director General of Police

R. Ranganayagi Vs State Rep.by

Sanjitha Vs Jeeva

V.Perumal Vs Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee -Iii

Sivakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Gomathi Vs M.Elango