Allowed

T.R.Nandakumar v. a.Chidambaram

Madras HC27 Nov 2023CRL OP/2719/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioners in CC No.4052 of 2016 upon finding that their accomplices had already been granted relief in similar petitions. The petition based on Section 482 CrPC was allowed and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in C.C No.4052 of 2016 quashed as against the petitioners; CrO.P. allowed; connected M.P. closed.

T.R.Nandakumar Vs a.Chidambaram — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.2719 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 27.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.2719 of 2022

¶7

and Crl.M.P.No.1257 of 2022

¶8

T.R.Nandakumar

¶9

M/s Sundar Diabetics Dezire Private Limited No.6A, Centuary Plaza, 560-562, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-18.

¶10

...Petitioners

¶11

-Vs-

¶12

A.Chidambaram, Food Safety Officer, Code No-548, Chennai District Tamil Nadu Food Safety and Medical Administrative Department, 33, Jones Road, Saidapet, Chennai-15. ...Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to call for the records in CC No.4052 of 2016 on the file of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15 and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Amizhdhu For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.2719 of 2022

¶17

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.4052 of 2016, on the file of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶19

It is seen that there are totally 5 accused in this case. The petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2. Already this Court, by an order dated 06.05.2022, in Crl.O.P.Nos.26918 and 26919 of 2016 quashed the proceedings in C.C.No.4052 of 2016, on the file of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15, insofar as A3 to A5. The petitioners herein also stand in the same footing. Therefore, this Court is inclined to quash the proceedings insofar as the petitioners also.

¶20

In view of the above, the proceedings in C.C No.4052 of 2016,

¶21

Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Crl.O.P.No.2719 of 2022

¶23

on the file of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15, is hereby quashed as against the petitioners. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. 27.11.2023 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order mn

¶24

¶25

The IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15.

¶26

The Food Safety Officer, Code No-548, Chennai District Tamil Nadu Food Safety and Medical Administrative Department, 33, Jones Road, Saidapet, Chennai-15.

¶27

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶28

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

¶29

¶30

Page 3 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.2719 of 2022

¶33

Crl.O.P.No.2719 of 2022

¶34

27.11.2023

¶35

Page 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T.R.Nandakumar v. a.Chidambaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.R.Nandakumar v. a.Chidambaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalaiselvi, Vs Sivasubramanian

M/S.Helios and Matheson Vs the State Rep. by

Ravi Vs Devaki

Raja Vs State Rep by

S.Selvaraj Vs State Rep by

Ramaththal Vs the District Collector