An application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as infructuous after the counsel for the Government conceded that the petitioner had already been arrested and remanded to judicial custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.23946 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner in this case has been arrested and remanded to Judicial custody.
(Criminal Side) concedes the fact submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
08.11.2023
mkn2
Petitioner
State
C.V. KARITHKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
