The petitioner, apprehending arrest for offences under IPC and the Mines Act, sought anticipatory bail. The court found the petitioner had already been arrested and remanded to custody, dismissing the petition as infructuous.
No relief granted. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.23874 of 2023
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379, 430 of IPC r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No. 255 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.
16.11.2023
ham
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail remains maintainable after the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
Police
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
