Raja v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of IPC offences including forgery, imposing conditions regarding daily reporting to police, maintaining connectivity, and submitting bio-data.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners released on bail upon arrest or appearance within 15 days, conditioned on executing bond with sureties, daily police reporting, and maintaining communication.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.23858 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.23858 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioners/A1,A2&A4, who apprehend arrest at the hands
of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 363, 323, 324, 387 and 506(ii) of I.P.C, in Crime No.285 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto compliant leased out his 5 acres of land to first petitioner herein and he cultivated plantain and watermelon fruits. The de-facto complainant instructed him to stop watermelon cultivation and to continue plantain cultivation alone, since several pesticides were used in watermelon which tend to spoil the quality of soil. It is further stated that the accused persons had joined together and had extracted the de-facto complainant's signature in blank papers. Hence the case.
- The de-facto complainant had also filed an application
seeking permission to intervene in the matter. Permission is granted.
- The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He however very seriously objects to the statement that blank
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners apprehending arrest for offences under the IPC in a case involving alleged blank signature forgery.
Whether the facts and circumstances justify the imposition of strict reporting and communication conditions for the grant of bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
Coram
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court