have been executed on different dates between 04.09.2013 to 13.11.2013. In some cases, the respondent had claimed that she intended to execute only a Power of Attorney, whereas the petitioners had falsely created a Sale Deed and forged her signatures in all pages except for the first and second pages. In some cases, it is the case of the respondent that though the respondent intended to convey only a portion of the property, the petitioners had added some more properties in the schedule by forging her signature in those pages. The above allegations, on the face of it appears to be improbable. All the documents are registered documents. It is a matter of common sense that these documents are presented in presence of the Registrar. The allegation that the signatures in some of the pages were forged is an after thought and belies common sense. That apart, the respondent filed a Civil Suit on the file of the Sub-Court, Perundurai in O.S.No.55 of 2017 and the said suit was dismissed for default. The respondent had filed a petition for restoration, the same was allowed with a conditional order to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/-, but she had not complied with the conditional order and hence, the restoration petition was also dismissed in I.A.No.1 of 2018 by order dated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/8
