The Single Judge granted leave to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the acquittal of the accused in a criminal case involving cheque dishonour, noting arguable issues on the establishment of legally enforceable debt by the complainant.
Leave to file criminal appeal against acquittal granted; registry directed to number appeal and list for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.20957 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR No.43488 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.20957 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.43488 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C, to grant leave to prefer an appeal against the judgment dated 27.06.2023 made in C.C.No.539 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level-II, Coimbatore.
accused admitted his signature on the cheque, the learned Trial Court Judge acquitted him on the ground that the complainant had not established the legally enforceable debt.
appeal and therefore, leave is granted as prayed for.
Crl.O.P.No.20957 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR No.43488 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
vum
otherwise in order and list the matter under the caption "For Admission".
13.09.2023
vum
Crl.O.P.No.20957 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.43488 of 2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the acquittal of the accused for cheque dishonour.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
