Dismissed

Y.B.Distributors v. M/S. Gemini Integrated Facility

Madras HC12 Sept 2023CRL OP/20806/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the petition for setting aside the docket order. It upheld the return of the petition for seeking relaxation of the 20% compensation deposit under S. 148(1) NI Act, directing deposit within four weeks instead of allowing reduction.

What did the court decide?

The docket order was not set aside; instead, the petitioners were directed to deposit 20% of the compensation within four weeks.

Y.B.Distributors Vs M/S. Gemini Integrated Facility — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl O.P.No.20806 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.09.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.20806 of 2023

¶7

1.Y.B.Distributors,

¶8

rep.by its proprietors, M/s.Bharat T.H.Shah, O/o.Harilal Shah, Office No.28, Somasundaram Nagar, Krishnadoss Road, Mangalapuram opp. to SPR buildings, Near Otteri police station, Chennai - 600 012.

¶9

2.M/s.Bharath T.H.Shah, O/o.Harilal Shah, residing at No.4567, North Ton Tower-2, Flat No.603, Stephens Road, Binny Mills, Perambur Baracks Road, Chennai - 600 012. ... Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

M/s.Gemini Integrated facility Management Pvt. Ltd., Partnership firm Mr.K.Vijayakumar Partner, Office No.31, Jothi Nagar, Lakshmipuram, Kolathur, Chennai - 600 099. ... Respondent

¶12

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Crl O.P.No.20806 of 2023

¶14

PRAYER

¶15

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the docket order on 25.01.2023 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge in Crl.M.P.Sr.No.2000 of 2023 in Criminal Appeal No.310 of 2022.

¶16

For Petitioners : Mr.K.V.Ramesh

¶17

*****

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the

¶20

docket order passed by the Court below on 25.01.2023 returning the petition filed by the petitioners seeking for modification of the condition imposed by the Court below while suspending the sentence imposed against the petitioners, pending Criminal Appeal No.310 of 2022.

¶21

Heard Mr.K.V.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioners and carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶22

The Court below was perfectly right in not entertaining the

¶23

petition since Section 148(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act itself provides a deposit of minimum of 20% of the compensation awarded by

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Crl O.P.No.20806 of 2023

¶27

the trial Court. In view of the same, there is no scope for reducing this percentage. At the best, this Court can only give some more time to the petitioners to deposit this amount. Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the petitioners to deposit 20% of the compensation amount within a period of four (4) weeks from today. It is made clear that if the petitioners fail to deposit the amount within the time stipulated by this Court, the suspension of sentence granted in favour of the petitioners shall stand cancelled automatically without any further reference to this Court and the Court below shall take steps to secure the petitioners in order to serve the sentence imposed by the trial Court.

¶28

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶29

12.09.2023

¶30

Note: Issue order copy by 13.09.2023

¶31

Index: Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes / No

¶32

rjr/gm

¶33

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Crl O.P.No.20806 of 2023

¶35

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

¶36

¶37

¶38

The Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai.

¶39

Crl.O.P.No.20806 of 2023

¶40

12.09.2023

¶41

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Y.B.Distributors v. M/S. Gemini Integrated Facility

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.B.Distributors v. M/S. Gemini Integrated Facility

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sugunabhai (a) Suguna Vs Mathiyazhagan

A.Devakumar Vs State Rep by

M.Dungar Singh Vs the Inspector of Police

Y.B.Distributors Vs B2C Vending Solution

Hyundai Motor India Limited Vs the Secretary

Akhila Bharath Hindu Maha Sabha Vs the Superintendent of Police