Arulmani @ Manikandan Arul v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed two petitions for anticipatory bail. The petitioners sought bail against severe harassment charges at an ATM and a hotel where college students were targeted. The Court rejected the plea citing the petitioners' prior history as hooligans and their tendency to abscond from police clutches, fearing non-cooperation with investigation.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail petitions were dismissed on the ground that the petitioner lacks cooperation and tends to abscond.