The court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a cheating case involving fraud regarding a foreign medical seat. The judge found the petitioner admitted to accepting money and failing to deliver the seat or refund it, deeming the matter too serious for bail.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.18835 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.18835 of 2023
| Reserved On | 05.09.2023 |
|---|---|
| Pronounced On | 12.09.2023 |
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
It is a case of foreign country medical seat fraud. The petitioner/A2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 120B, 417, 420 and 506(1) of IPC in Crime No.24 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
Page 1 of 4
Crl.O.P.No.18835 of 2023
course in India and hence, on return, as the petitioner refused to repay the amount nor got a medical seat to the de-facto complainant's son, the complaint has been filed.
Page 2 of 4
Crl.O.P.No.18835 of 2023
dismissed.
12.09.2023 (2/2)
mpl
Page 3 of 4
Crl.O.P.No.18835 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
mpl
Crl.O.P.No.18835 of 2023
.09.2023
(2/2)
Page 4 of 4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail ought to be granted to the petitioner accused of medical seat fraud.
Whether the gravity of the alleged cheating offence warrants rejection of anticipatory bail.
PETITIONER/A2
STATE (RESPONDENT POLICE)
TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
