Disposed

Muthu v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC26 Jun 2023CRL OP/1818/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Muthu approached the Madras High Court seeking police protection for his life and property from a dispute over waste water discharge. The Court accepted the submissions that the dispute was amicably settled with undertakings from the respondents and directed the Police to consider the petitioner's fresh representation.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.03.2022 and pass appropriate orders within two weeks.

Muthu Vs the State Rep by Its — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.1818 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.1818 of 2023

Muthu

Petitioner

1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Ranipet Police Station, Ranipet District.

¶11

2.Vasanth

¶12

3.Chinna Muniyan ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the Respondent herein viz the Inspector of Police, Ranipet Police Station, Ranipet District to give police protection to the petitioner herein and his property situated at Melvelam Village comprised in S.No.432/3A, Ranipet District as he apprehends danger to his life and property.

¶13

For Petitioner ... Mr.G.P.Sivakumar

¶14

For R-1

¶15

... Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl side)

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.1818 of 2023

¶19

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the Respondent herein viz the Inspector of Police, Ranipet Police Station, Ranipet District to give police protection to the petitioner herein and his property situated at Melvelam Village comprised in S.No.432/3A, Ranipet District as he apprehends danger to his life and property.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, petitioner is the owner of a plot in Survey No.432/3A situated at Mel Velam Village, Sholinghur Taluk, Vellore District. The private respondents 2 and 3 are letting waste and drainage water in his plot. When petitioner asked about this, they told him to take whatever action he wants. In such circumstances, petitioner filed this petition.

¶21

Learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that, on

¶22

the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, an enquiry was conducted. Both parties appeared for enquiry and 2 and 3rd respondents undertook not to let waste and drainage into the plot of the petitioner.

¶23

Page 2 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Crl.O.P.No.1818 of 2023

¶26

Mr.S.Sathish, learned counsel for the 2nd and 3rd respondents is present today and submitted that respondents 2 and 3 will not let waste and drainage water into plot of the petitioner.

¶27

In the light of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.03.2022 and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶28

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶29

26.06.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order

¶30

gd To

¶31

The Inspector of Police, Ranipet Police Station, Ranipet District.

¶32

Page 3 of 4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Crl.O.P.No.1818 of 2023

¶35

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

¶36

¶37

Crl.O.P.No.1818 of 2023

¶38

26.06.2023

¶39

Page 4 of 4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Muthu v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthu v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Sri Sathya Sai Mandali Trust Vs M/S.Flash Builders Pvt. Ltd.

A.Y.Bhavani Vs Inspector of Police (Law and Order)

M.Kannan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Venkatesan Vs State Rep by

Ashok Kumar Vs the State Rep by the Inspector of Police

Murali Vs the State Rep.by