The Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR on the ground that compromise was not sufficient. A direction was issued to the Magistrate to act upon the filed final report within four weeks.
Petition disposed of; direction to Magistrate to act upon final report within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P No.17950 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P No.17950 of 2023
Dinesh @ Pambu Dinesh S/o.Deenan
... Petitioner
vs.
S/o.Selvaraj
... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of the proceedings in Crime No.2197 of 2020 on the file of the N2 Kasimedu Police Station, Chennai and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthilvel
For Respondent-1 : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor
For Respondent-2 : Mr.Nithyavel
1/4
Crl.O.P No.17950 of 2023
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.2197 of 2020, pending on the file of the first respondent.
filed to quash the F.I.R. on the ground that there is a compromise between the petitioner and the second respondent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to quash the F.I.R. on the ground of compromise.
learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai to act upon the final report filed by the first respondent Police within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
2/4
Crl.O.P No.17950 of 2023
with law.
11.08.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order rsi
To
3/4
Crl.O.P No.17950 of 2023
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
rsi
Crl.O.P No.17950 of 2023
11.08.2023
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court is inclined to quash the FIR on the ground of compromise between the petitioner and the second respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dinesh @ Pambu Dinesh
State Inspector of Police, N-2 Kasimedu Police Station
Kumaran
N. ANAND VENKATESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
