Allowed

K.K.Nithya Varshan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Jun 2023CRL OP/16920/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order converts interim anticipatory bail granted on condition of deposit into absolute bail. The court imposes conditions requiring police reporting, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and prohibiting absconding. It empowers the trial court to deal with breaches and specifies registration of an FIR under Section 229A IPC if the accused absconds.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail made absolute; petitioner to report weekly, not tamper with evidence or abscond, with trial court empowered to act on breach.

K.K.Nithya Varshan Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P. No. 16920 of 2022

¶2

Crl.O.P. No.16920 of 2022

¶3

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶4

Earlier, this court by an order dated 27.04.2023 granted interim anticipatory bail on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees twenty five lakhs only) to the credit of Crime No.1 of 2021 before the concerned Magistrate within a period of four weeks and adjourned the matter for reporting compliance.

¶5

Today, when the matter taken up for hearing under the

¶6

caption “For reporting compliance”, Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned senior counsel for the petitioner appeared and submitted that the petitioner has deposited the amount as per the order passed by this court. Hence, he seeks to grant anticipatory bail.

¶7

Considering the facts and circumstances and also both side

¶8

submissions, the interim anticipatory bail granted by this court vide order dated 23.01.2023 is made absolute with certain conditions that

¶9

1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

Crl.O.P. No. 16920 of 2022

¶11

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Tuesday at 10.30 a.m. for the period of three months

¶12

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶13

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or

¶14

trial.

¶15

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶16

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶17

22.06.2023

¶18

rpp

¶19

2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Crl.O.P. No. 16920 of 2022

¶21

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶22

rpp

¶23

Crl.O.P.No. 16920 of 2022

¶24

22.06.2023

¶25

3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.K.Nithya Varshan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.K.Nithya Varshan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S. Palanisamy (Died) Vs Raja Gounder (Deceased)

D.Sankarayyah(died) Vs P.K.Babu

D.Sai Lalan Khumar Vs K.Kanchana

Vellaimani @ Vinothkumar Vs Inspector of Police

Ruban Vs the Inspector of Police

Pradeep Vs the Inspector of Police