Disposed

Albert Rajkumar v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC25 Jul 2023CRL OP/16614/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras entertained a criminal original petition seeking police protection. It directed the police to conduct a preliminary enquiry under _Lalitha Kumari_ within two weeks, directing the petitioner to cooperate, and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Directions to police to co-operate with petitioner, conduct enquiry within two weeks, and decide further course of action.

Albert Rajkumar Vs the Commissioner of Police — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 27.07.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Crl.O.P No.16614 of 2023

Albert Rajkumar

Petitioner

vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police,

¶11

Greater Chennai, Vepery,

¶12

Chennai.

¶13

2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anna Nagar District, Chennai.

¶14

3.The Inspector of Police,

¶15

K4-Anna Nagar Police Station, Anna Nagar, Chennai.

¶16

4.Kalaivani

¶17

Respondents

¶18

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code

¶19

of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 3rd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner pursuant to the online complaints given to the

¶20

1^st respondent on 07.07.2023.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Muruganantham

¶23

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3

¶25

ORDER

¶26

This Criminal Original petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner pursuant to the online complaints given to the 1^st respondent on 07.07.2023.

¶27

2.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, based on the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.521 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶28

3.The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the Police for enquiry and the respondent Police shall conduct the enquiry keeping in mind the judgment in Lalitha Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in

¶29

2013 (6) CTC 353 . On completion of the enquiry, the respondent Police shall take a decision regarding the further course of action. This process shall be completed by the respondent Police within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

¶32

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶33

27.07.2023

¶34

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

¶35

ssr

¶36

¶37

1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai.

¶38

2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anna Nagar District, Chennai.

¶39

3.The Inspector of Police,

¶40

K4-Anna Nagar Police Station, Anna Nagar, Chennai.

¶41

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

¶44

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J. ssr

¶45

Crl.O.P No.16614 of 2023

¶46

27.07.2023

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Albert Rajkumar v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Albert Rajkumar v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Magi Vs Director General of Police

Gandhi Vs State Rep.by

K.Chandran Vs State Rep by

G.Durairaj Vs B.Babu

Niharika Hospital Vs State Rep. by

K.E.Sekar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police