M.S.Mohammed Nazeemudeen v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Madras held that as further proceedings in the underlying case were stopped under Section 258 Cr.P.C. due to non-service of summons, there was no survival for adjudication. Consequently, the petition to quash was closed.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Original Petition and the connected Miscellaneous Petition are closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.13925 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Crl.O.P.No.13925 of 2021 & Crl.M.P.No.7612 of 2021
1.M.S.Mohammed Nazeemudeen ... Petitioner Vs. 1. State: Rep. by The Inspector of Police, V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station, Chennai.
- N.Mani. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to call for the records in C.C.No.984/2013 on the file of the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same as against the petitioner/accused.
For Petitioners : M/s.S.Haja Mohideen Cisthi For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
1/4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition to quash proceedings can be disposed of as closed when further proceedings were stayed due to non-service of summons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.M.S.Mohammed Nazeemudeen
- respondent
The State: Rep. by The Inspector of Police, V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station, Chennai
- respondent
N.Mani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court