Petitioner applied for anticipatory bail regarding an FIR. Counsel submitted the underlying FIR was quashed, rendering the prayer infructuous. Court closed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.13600 of 2023 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
The Petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the Respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 294(b), 506(i) & 313 of IPC in Crime No.21 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner represented that FIR in Cr.No.21 of 2023 was already quashed and the prayer in this Petition has become infructuous.
3.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
07.09.2023
sai
Petitioner
Respondent police
RMT TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
