This order dismisses a Criminal Original Petition seeking anticipatory bail. The High Court refused bail due to the offence's gravity, the large amount involved, the investigation's crucial stage, and risks of witness tampering.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected and the petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.1177 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.1177 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471 read with 34 of IPC, in Crime No.124 of 2015, seek anticipatory bail.
1/2
Crl.O.P.No.1177 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
gbi
the petitioners borrowed loan for a sum of Rs.1.92 Crore from the defacto complainant's bank and not repaid the loan amount. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
involved in this case, the investigation is at crucial stage, there is possibility of tampering the witnesses, hampering the investigation, this Court is not inclined
to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
gbi
25.01.2023
Crl.O.P.No.1177 of 2023
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners accused under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471 IPC for failure to repay a loan.
Whether the gravity of the offence and the crucial stage of investigation warrant denial of bail to prevent witness tampering.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
T.V.Thamilselvi
The Police
T.V.Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
