Dismissed
Ameena Bagam v. State by
Madras HCCRL OP/10998/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Crl.O.P. under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashal of proceedings was dismissed as infructuous due to final report filed and cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Crl.M.P. closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Crl.O.P.No.10998 of 2021
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 07.06.2023
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
¶6
Crl.O.P.No.10998 of 2021 and
¶7
Crl.M.P.No.6504 of 2021
¶8
- Ameena Bagam
¶9
- Samsudeen ...Petitioners
¶10
-Vs-
¶11
- 1.The State rep. by its: Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Villupuram District.
¶12
2.Krishnan
¶13
... Respondents
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ameena Bagam
- petitioner
Samsudeen
- respondent
The State
- respondent
Krishnan
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court