The High Court closed three criminal original petitions and a writ petition after the learned counsel submitted that the related criminal proceedings in CC.No.3 of 2016 ended in acquittal by order dated 09.12.2022. No costs were awarded.
Petitions closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.OP.Nos.10758 & 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017, WP.No.22269 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.OP.Nos.10758, 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017 & WP.No.22269 of 2016
Crl.OP.No.10758 of 2016
1.KRI GANESAAMURTHY
2.K.C.THNAGARAJ ... [ PETITIONERS]
Vs
THE STATE REP BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING (EOW), ERODE DISTRICT CR.NO.31 OF 2014
...[ RESPONDENT ]
Prayer: Criminal original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent police herein to initiate attachment proceeding in accordance with law as per the TNPID ACT.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.P.Shanmugasundaram
For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran,
Government Advocate(crl.side)
Crl.OP.No.995 of 2017
1.KRI.GANESAAMURTHY 2.K.C.THANGARAJ
... [ PETITIONERS ]
Page 1 of 6
Crl.OP.Nos.10758 & 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017, WP.No.22269 of 2016
Vs
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING (EOW), ERODE, ERODE DISTRICT CR.NO.31 OF 2014.
3.PERIYASAMY
(R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER MADE IN CRL.M.P.NO.360/2018 IN
Crl.OP.No.995 of 2017)
....[ RESPONDENTS]
Prayer : To direct the respondent police herein to initiate immediate steps to seal the Dharani Turmeric Godown at Manjal Valagam, Nasiyanoor Main Road, Erode-638 107 in connection with Crime No. 31 of 2014 on the file of Economic Offence Wing, Erode after obtaining necessary orders from the appropriate authorities to safeguard the interest of depositors
For Petitioners : Mr.P.P.Shanmugasundaram
For Respondents
For R1 : Mr.L.Baskaran,
Government Advocate(crl.side)
Crl.OP.No.25831 of 2016
PERIYASAMY
.....[ PETITIONER ]
Vs
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING,
Page 2 of 6
Crl.OP.Nos.10758 & 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017, WP.No.22269 of 2016
ERODE DISTRICT.
.....[ RESPONDENT ]
Prayer : To direct the respondent to further investigate in Crime No.31 of 2014 on the file of the respondent in respect of the swindled money by the other accused and investment made with the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan
For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran, Government Advocate(crl.side)
WP.NO.22269 of 2016
Vs.
Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings No.1770/F-1/2016 dated 06.05.2016 and quash the same consequently directing the respondents 1 and 2 to relieve the petitioners from M/s.Kongu Finance and Investment without insisting the petitioners to get signature in Form-5 from the 3rd and 4th respondents herein.
Page 3 of 6
Crl.OP.Nos.10758 & 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017, WP.No.22269 of 2016
For Petitioners : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents
For R1 : Mr.L.Baskaran, Government Advocate(crl.side)
COMMON ORDER
This matter has been listed today under the caption 'entire bundle
not available cases'.
petitions are closed.
22.11.2023
Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order lok
Page 4 of 6
Crl.OP.Nos.10758 & 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017, WP.No.22269 of 2016
To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 5 of 6
Crl.OP.Nos.10758 & 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017, WP.No.22269 of 2016
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
lok
Crl.OP.Nos.10758, 25831 of 2016, 995 of 2017 & WP.No.22269 of 2016
22.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 6 of 6
2 provisions across 2 enactments
KRI GANESAAMURTHY
K.C. THANGARAJ
PERIYASAMY
K.P. DURAISAMY
P.C. MUTHUSAMY
THE STATE REP BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
