S.Sunitha v. B.Mukundan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a delay of 371 days in filing a criminal revision, satisfied with the reasons assigned in the supporting affidavit.
What did the court decide?
The petition to condone delay of 371 days is allowed; Registry directed to number the Criminal Revision and list it for admission.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.9046 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.SR No.27029 of 2022
Crl.M.P.No.9046 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.27029 of 2022
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to
condone the delay of 371 days in filing the Criminal Revision against the Judgment dated 23.01.2018 in C.A.No.141 of 2018 on the file of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
- Though notice served on the respondent and his name is printed
in the cause list, there is no representation for the respondent.
- This Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit
filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is allowed.
- Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is
otherwise in order, and list the matter for admission.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 371 days in filing the criminal revision can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court