Sundaresan v. State by the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
in Crl.O.P.No.4731 of 2023…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.5875 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No.4731 of 2023
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent.
2.Considering the reasons stated and having satisfied with the same, this Court allows this petition.
3.Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the main petition and issue notice to the second respondent. Private notice is also permitted. Post the matter after vacation. sli 26.04.2023
G. Chandrasekaran
Government
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court