V.K.Tamilmani v. the State, Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge allowed the petition to amend the prayer, directing the registry to correct the relief sought from quashing an FIR (now calling for records) instead.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to amend the petition's prayer to call for records rather than quash the FIR.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.5243 of 2023 in
Crl.O.P.No.5527 of 2021 SUNDER MOHAN, J.
The petition is filed to amend the prayer to call for the records made in C.C.No.891 of 2022 on the file of Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu instead of to quashing the FIR in Crime No.69 of 2021 on the file of Inspector of Police, Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station to secure the ends of Justice.
2 . Considering the fact that sufficient reasons have been given in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the petition is ordered as prayed for.
3 . List the main case on 13.06.2023.
4 . The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments.
05.06.2023
shr
Coram
SUNDER MOHAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court