Disposed

Saranraj @ Appasamy v. State by

Madras HC9 Mar 2023CRL MP/2801/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition was filed to rectify a High Court order by correcting the impugned criminal case number from C.C.No.209 of 2021 to C.C.No.329 of 2021 and the name of the Judicial Magistrate. The Court ordered the necessary corrections and a fresh copy to be issued.

What did the court decide?

Order passed in Crl.O.P.No.25942 of 2022 is amended to replace C.C.No.209 of 2021 with C.C.No.329 of 2021 and Judicial Magistrate No.II with No.III.

Saranraj @ Appasamy Vs State by — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.M.P.No.2801 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No. 25942 of 2022

¶2

V. SIVAGNANAM, J.

¶3

This petition is filed to amend the correct calendar case number as C.C.No.329 of 2021 instead of C.C.No.209 of 2021 in the order passed by

¶4

this Court in Crl.O.P.No.25942 of 2022, dated 27.10.2022.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who submitted

¶6

that due to oversight, in the petition in Crl.O.P.No.25942 of 2022, seeking to quash the calender case pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.III, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District, the calendar case has been wrongly mentioned as C.C.No.209 of 2021 instead of C.C.No.329 of 2021 and based on the same, an order was passed by this Court quashing the C.C.No.209 of 2021 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.III, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶7

He further submitted that in paragraph 6 of the above said order, it has been wrongly mentioned as Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore District instead of Judicial Magistrate No.III, Cuddalore District. Thus, he prayed for correcting the abovesaid mistakes crept in, in the order passed by this Court

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

1/1

¶10

V. SIVAGNANAM, J.

¶11

msr

¶12

in Crl.O.P.No.25942 of 2022, dated 27.10.2022.

¶13

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the calendar case number C.C.No.209 of 2021 is replaced with C.C.No.329 of 2021, wherever it appears, in the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.25942 of 2022, dated 27.10.2022, Further, in para 6 of the abovesaid order, the terms ' Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore district ' shall be replaced with the terms 'Judicial Magistrate No.III, Cuddalore District.

¶14

In other aspects, the earlier order stand unaltered.

¶15

This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶16

09.03.2023

¶17

msr

¶18

Note: The Registry is directed to make necessary corrections as stated above and issue fresh order copy.

¶19

Crl.M.P.No.2801 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No. 25942 of 2022

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

2/1

Saranraj @ Appasamy v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saranraj @ Appasamy v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sakthivel Vs the Inspector of Police

Gautham Vs S.Dellibabu

S.Janarthanam Vs State Rep by Its

Kannan Vs the State Rep by Its

Kamatchi Vs Inspector of Police

E.Sivakumar Vs S.Kannadasan