Petitions filed to implead a bank as a second respondent in existing criminal appeals. The Court allowed the petitions pending trial settlement and compoundability.
Directing the registry to amend Criminal Appeal Nos.259 & 262 of 2017 to implead M/s.Synidcate Bank as the second respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.Nos.18384 & 18386 of 2023 in Crl.A.Nos.259 & 262 of 2017
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
These petitions have been filed to implead M/s.Synidcate Bank, Represented by its Branch Manager, Gugai Branch, Salem as the second respondent in Crl.A.Nos.259 & 262 of 2017.
found guilty for the offence under Section 420 of IPC and sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/- each. Against the judgment of conviction, the petitioners have filed appeals in Crl.A.Nos.259
& 262 of 2017 before this Court.
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
ham
Criminal Appeal Nos.259 & 362 of 2017.
22.11.2023
ham
Crl.M.P.Nos.18384 & 18386 of 2023 in Crl.A.Nos.259 & 262 of 2017
1/2
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
M/s.Synidcate Bank
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
