A criminal miscellaneous petition filed by the de facto complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the second respondent accused. The respondent claimed compliance but the court found no cooperation. The bail was cancelled.
The anticipatory bail granted by order dated 14.11.2019 in Crl.O.P.No.17985 of 2019 is cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P No.1818 of 2023
Crl.M.P.No.1818 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No.17985 of 2019
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 2nd respondent/accused in Crl.O.P.No.17985 of 2019 dated 14.11.2019 by this Court, in Crime No.5 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent Police.
for the first respondent.
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
Crl.M.P No.1818 of 2023
msrm 4. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent/accused is regularly complying with the condition as imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to dismiss the petition.
13.02.2023
msrm
Crl.M.P.No.1818 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No.17985 of 2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted to the accused on 14.11.2019 should be cancelled due to non-compliance with court conditions and lack of cooperation in investigation.
Petitioner/Defacto Complainant
2nd Respondent/Accused
First Respondent/Police
T.V. ThamilSelvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
