Single-judge order condoning an 87-day delay in filing a criminal appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, as no objection was raised and the court was satisfied with the affidavit.
Petition condoning delay allowed; Criminal Appeal directed to be numbered and listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.13870 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.40220 of 2023
Crl.M.P.No.13870 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.40220 of 2023
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to
condone the delay of 87 days in filing the Criminal Appeal against the Judgment dated 15.03.2023 in Spl.S.C.No.50 of 2018 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Magalir Neethimandram, Krishnagiri.
filed in support of this petition. Hence, the petition is allowed.
05.09.2023
vum
R.HEMALATHA, J.
Crl.M.P.No.13870 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.40220 of 2023
vum
Crl.M.P.No.13870 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.40220 of 2023
05.09.2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner (unnamed in text)
Respondents 1 and 2
R.HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
