J.Jayakumar, AGE-32 v. S.Bharanitharan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal filed by J. Jayakumar as abated due to the appellant's reported death, filed on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.A.No.681 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.12.2023
CORAM:
The Honourable MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.A.No.681 of 2017
J.Jayakumar ...Accused/Respondent/Appellant
-Vs-
S.Bharanitharan ...Complainant/Appellant/Respondent
Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed in C.A.No.159 of 2017 dated 18.08.2017 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode reversing the order of acquittal passed in STC No.180 of 2016 dated 23.02.2017 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate/FTC NoII, Erode.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Kamadevan For Respondent : Mr.I.C.Vasudevan
1/3
Crl.A.No.681 of 2017
J U D G M E N T
Today, 07.12.2023, when the case came up for hearing, the learned
Counsel for the Appellant filed a memo along with the Death Certificate of the Appellant, reporting the death of the Appellant.
Appellant, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as abated.
07.12.2023
shl Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
To
2/3
Crl.A.No.681 of 2017
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.,
shl
Crl.A.No.681 of 2017
07.12.2023
3/3
J. Jayakumar
S. Bharanitharan
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court