Sekar v. Sundaramoorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
During hearing of Criminal Appeal no. 652 of 2011, the appellant was absent for a second listing marked for dismissal. The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Appeal No. 652 of 2011 dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
Crl.A.No.652 of 2011
IN THE HIGH Court OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.11.2023
CORAM:
The Honourable MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.A.No.652 of 2011
Sekar
...Appellant / Complainant
-Vs-
Sundaramoorthy ...Respondent / Accused
Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, to set aside the judgment dated 16.08.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Cuddalore, in C.C.No.328 of 2007.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.Tirounavocarassou
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 CrPC should be allowed in absence of appellant's representation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sekar
- respondent
Sundaramoorthy
Coram
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court