Kr. Nagarajan v. Mr.Madhusudhan Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition claiming non-compliance with a specific order. The respondent appeared through counsel, who submitted that the order had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
None; the contempt petition was closed in the respondent's favor.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.938 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P(MD)No.938 of 2023
KR.Nagarajan
... Petitioner
v.
Mr.Madhusudhan Reddy, District Collector, Sivagangai District.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent / contemnor for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 28.03.2022 passed in WP(MD)No.5382 of 2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Navaneetharaja For Respondent : Mr.J.John Rajadurai, Government Advocate
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be closed upon affirmed compliance with the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KR. Nagarajan
- respondent
Mr. Madhusudhan Reddy, District Collector, Sivagangai District
Coram
B. Pugalandhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court