S.Gopinath v. Omana
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recorded that the order of this Court in the principal writ petition had been complied with by the respondent.
What did the court decide?
this Contempt Petition stands closed
What the court decided
Cont.P(MD)No.235 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P(MD)No.235 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.19828 of 2021
S.Gopinath
... Petitioner/Petitioner
vs.
Omana, President, Vilathurai Village Panchayat, Kappukadu Post, Kunathoor Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
.. Contemnor/Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor / 1st respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP (MD)No.19828 of 2021, dated 02.11.2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
[issue not determinable from text: no specific legal question was framed or answered]
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Gopinath
- respondent
Omana
Coram
Pugalendi, B.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court