I.Subramanian v. S.Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for punishment due to non-compliance with a previous order. The court recorded the submission that the order was complied with and closed the petition, granting liberty to challenge the order.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.(MD)No.2189 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CONT.P.(MD)No.2189 of 2023
in WP(MD) No.27507 of 2022
I.Subramanian Petitioner
Vs
1.S.Krishnan,
The Joint Commissioner/the Executive Officer, Arulmighu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Thirukovil, Madurai.
2.N. Suresh,
The Deputy Commissioner/the Executive Officer, Arulmighu Subramaniyasamy Thirukovil, Thirupparankundram, Madurai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed after recording respondents' submission regarding compliance with the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
I.Subramanian
- respondent
S.Krishnan
- respondent
N. Suresh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court