In a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the Madurai Bench held there was substantial compliance of the impugned order and directed the respondent to disburse the remaining amount expeditiously before closing the petition.
Direction to respondent to disburse remaining amount expeditiously; Contempt Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. P(MD)No.8 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont. P(MD)No.8 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.19972 of 2022
S.Jawahar ... Petitioner
Vs.
Elangovan, Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation (TN) Limited, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondent
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / respondent for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.19972 of 2022, dated 09.09.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Thangavelu
For Respondent : Mr.K.Senthilkumar Standing Counsel
1/2
Cont. P(MD)No.8 of 2023
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
ORDER
There has been a substantial compliance of the order passed by this
Court.
expeditiously as possible. The contempt petition is closed.
14.02.2023
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi
ORDER MADE IN
Cont. P(MD)No.8 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.19972 of 2022
14.02.2023
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there has been substantial compliance with the order of this court in WP(MD)No.19972 of 2022 leading to closure of the contempt petition.
S. Jawahar
Elangovan, Managing Director
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
