Geetha v. Deepak Jacob I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the respondent admitted partial settlement and financial crisis. The Court closed the petition with liberty to reopen it upon failure to settle the remaining benefits within four weeks.
What did the court decide?
Monetary benefits to be settled within four weeks; liberty to reopen contempt petition upon failure.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) No.2012 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Cont.P.(MD) No.2012 of 2023 in W.P.(MD) No.13 of 2024
1.Geetha
2.S.Kavitha
3.M.Anitha 4.S.Vanitha Bhuvaneswari ... Petitioners
-vs-
Deepak Jacob, I.A.S., District Collector and Ex-Officio Chairman Management of Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases Hospital Sengipatti Thanjavur District-613 401 ... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.13 of 2014, dated 10.12.2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Geetha
- petitioner
S.Kavitha
- petitioner
M.Anitha
- petitioner
S.Vanitha Bhuvaneswari
- respondent
Deepak Jacob
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court