Disposed

Aided Higher Secondary School, v. Dr. Pugazhenthi

Madras HC9 Mar 2023CONT P(MD)/177/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition alleging violation of an earlier order recognizing a school manager, the court observed that the petitioner had not filed a proposal for approval as Correspondent cum Manager with the authorities. The judge concluded there were no grounds to issue a notice and closed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition stands closed. No costs awarded to the petitioner.

Aided Higher Secondary School, Vs Dr. Pugazhenthi — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD).No.177 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 09.03.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

Cont.P.(MD).No.177 of 2023 in W.P.(MD).No.14303 of 2015

¶7

Aided Higher Secondary School, Arumanai, Represented by its Correspondent and Manager, B.Saraswathy Amma. ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Dr.Pugazhenthi, The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Office, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil-629 001. ... Contemnor/Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor/3^rd respondent for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order, dated 07.09.2022 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.14303 of 2015.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

1/4

¶14

Cont.P.(MD).No.177 of 2023

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.N.G.A.Natraj Government Advocate

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order passed by this Court on 07.09.2022 in W.P(MD)No.14303 of 2015 recognizing one Saraswathy Amma as the Correspondent and Manager of the school.

¶18

According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the

¶19

Government has so far not recognized the said Saraswathy Amma as Correspondent.

¶20

On written instructions from the Chief Educational Officer, Kanyakumari, the learned Government Advocate submits that so far Saraswathy Amma has not filed any proposal to approve her as the Correspondent cum Manager.

¶21

Therefore, it is clear that the writ petitioner is yet to approach the

¶22

authorities with an appropriate application for approving her as Correspondent

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

Cont.P.(MD).No.177 of 2023

¶26

cum Manager. I do not find any grounds to issue notice in the contempt petition.

¶27

Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs.

¶28

09.03.2023

¶29

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes gbg To

¶30

The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Office, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil-629 001.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/4

¶33

Cont.P.(MD).No.177 of 2023

¶34

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

¶35

gbg

¶36

Order made in Cont.P.(MD).No.177 of 2023

¶37

09.03.2023

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

4/4

Aided Higher Secondary School, v. Dr. Pugazhenthi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aided Higher Secondary School, v. Dr. Pugazhenthi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veeraiah Vs Mani

S. Mohammed Mirza Ismail, Vs Delhi Hall, a Partnership Firm

A.Poongodi, Vs S.Louis Loganathan

N.Ilavarasan Vs Indira

Kottursamy Vs Ganesan

Nakoda Homes Pvt.Ltd Vs Arumuga Nainar Trust