In this contempt proceeding for willful disobedience of a prior order, the Madras High Court reported that the impugned order was complied with and closed the petition by a negative order, allowing the petitioner to challenge this outcome.
Petitioner is given liberty to question the negative order; contempt petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1737 OF 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CONT.P.(MD)No.1737 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.17128 of 2022
P.Jeganathan ... Petitioner / Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Senthilkumar, District Revenue Officer(Bhoodan), Tirunelveli District,
Tirunelveli. ... Respondent / 2nd Respondent
Prayer: Contempt petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1971, to punish the contemnor / 2nd respondent for his deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.17128 of 2022 dated 02.08.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan
For Respondent : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader. * * *
1/3
2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1737 OF 2023
O R D E R
It is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. Negative order has been passed. The petitioner is given liberty to question the same.
12.09.2023
NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No
PMU
To:
The District Revenue Officer(Bhoodan), Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2/3
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
PMU
CONT.P.(MD)No.1737 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.17128 of 2022
12.09.2023
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Jeganathan
Mr.Senthilkumar
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
