In a contempt petition under Section 11 CPC Act 1971 regarding violation of an order, the Court noted that the underlying order had been complied with. Consequently, the Court closed the contempt petition without any punishment.
Contempt petition closed as the order in question was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1465 OF 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CONT.P.(MD)No.1465 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.3561 of 2023
Dharmalingam ... Petitioner / Petitioner
Vs.
Mrs.Shanthi, District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. ... Contemnor / 2nd Respondent
Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the respondent herein under the Contempt of Court Act for violating and wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 01.03.2023 passed in W.P.(MD)No.3561 of 2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Kamesh
For Respondent : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Additional Government Pleader.
1/3
2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1465 OF 2023
O R D E R
It is submitted that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with.
03.08.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU
To:
The District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.
2/3
3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1465 OF 2023
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
PMU
CONT.P.(MD)No.1465 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.3561 of 2023
03.08.2023
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharmalingam
Mrs. Shanthi
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
