The Hon'ble Madras High Court addressed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order dated 18.07.2022 regarding the deletion of a Lok Adalat award entry from an encumbrance certificate. The court found the order had already been recorded, declaring the petition closed without costs.
The contempt petition stands closed with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.(MD)No.1096 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CONT.P.(MD)No.1096 of 2023 in
W.P(MD)No.5684 of 2016
S.Kasikumar ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Jayanthi ...Contemnor/Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for the disobedience of the order, dated 18.07.2022 passed in W.P(MD)No.5684 of 2016 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order passed by this Court, dated 18.07.2022 made in W.P(MD)No.5684 of 2016.
CONT.P.(MD)No.1096 of 2023
delete the entry relating to registration of Lok Adalat award which was registered as Document No.2472 of 2014 on 22.07.2014.
respondent has brought to the notice of the Court that in the encumbrance certificate, the order of the High Court has been incorporated and the deletion of the said entries are recorded. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the entries have not been deleted. However, this Court finds that the order of this Court has already been recorded in the encumbrance certificate. No further orders are called for in the contempt petition. Hence, this Contempt Petition stands closed. In case, if the petitioner intends to register the decree in O.S.No.
189 of 2010, he is at liberty to do the same before the 2nd respondent.
21.06.2023
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No gbg
R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.
CONT.P.(MD)No.1096 of 2023
gbg
CONT.P.(MD)No.1096 of 2023 in W.P(MD)No.5684 of 2016
21.06.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending contempt petition alleging violation of the court's order requires representation or is already disposed of.
S.Kasikumar
Jayanthi
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
