Meiaram, v. Rajmohan
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act was closed by a one-line order noting that the earlier order had been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.1083 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont.P(MD)No.1083 of 2023 in
W.P(MD)No.8019 of 2023
Meiaram
... Petitioner / Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.Rajmohan,
Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam Limited, Kumbakonam.
2.Gunasekaran,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Meiaram
- respondent
Rajmohan
- respondent
Gunasekaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court