This thin contempt petition alleged non-compliance with a prior order. Counsel confirmed compliance was made. The Court closed the petition without costs.
Contempt petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.108 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Cont.P.(MD)No.108 of 2020
The Manager/Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India, No.72, P.T.Rajan Road, Opp. Kendra Vidyalaya, B.B.Kulam, Madurai. ... Petitioner
Vs.
S.Sahayam ... Contemnor
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the contemnor / writ petitioner for his willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 27.06.2019 passed by this Court in W.P. (MD)No.13611 of 2019.
_____________ Page 1 of 3_
For Petitioner : Mr.VS.Karthi For Respondent : Mr.A.Balaji
Cont.P.(MD)No.108 of 2020
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.]
The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging non compliance of the order dated 27.06.2019, made in W.P.(MD)No.13611 of 2019.
2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on either side submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.
3 . Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.
[D.K.K., J.] [R.V., J.]
27.01.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No
vsm
Page 2 of 3
Cont.P.(MD)No.108 of 2020
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
vsm
Cont.P.(MD)No.108 of 2020
27.01.2023
_____________ Page 3 of 3_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Manager/Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India
S.Sahayam
D.KRISHNAKUMAR
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
