R. Rajamani, v. Kakarla Usha I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitions seeking punishment for disobedience of orders were closed after counsel submitted that the orders had been complied with by the respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P(MD) No.1037 to 1043 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:13.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CONT.P.(MD)Nos.1037 to 1043 of 2023 in
WP(MD) Nos.19712, 18709, 19707,19708, 19709,19710 & 19711 of 2021
R.Rajamani
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mrs.Kakarla Usha, IAS., Rep by Principal Secretary to Government (School Education), Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.
2.Mrs.Aarthi, IAS (Incharge), The Commissioner of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai -6.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Rajamani
- respondent
Mrs. Kakarla Usha, IAS.
- respondent
Mrs. Aarthi, IAS
- respondent
Dr. P. A. Naresh
- respondent
Mrs. Geetha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court