Sp.Saraswathy v. Paul Anand
Case brief
What is this about?
Judge closed the contempt petition after the Government Advocate submitted that the impugned order had been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.No.948 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
CONT.P.No.948 of 2023
SP.Saraswathi ...Petitioner
vs.
Paul Anand, Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, 1st Cross Street, New Kumaran Nagar, Sholinganallur, Chennai. ...Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the Respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 18.04.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7919 of 2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.Kaushik N.Sharma for KNS Law Chambers
For Respondent : Mr.M.Alagu Gowtham, GA.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SP.Saraswathi
- respondent
Paul Anand
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court