A. Periyanayagam (Rtd Staff NO.TR0704) v. Ponmudi
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition challenging disobedience of an order dated 29.11.2016 was closed after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the order had been complied with.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.756 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
Cont.P.No.756 of 2023
A.Periyanayagam
...Petitioner
-Vs-
Ponmudi The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Ramakrishna Salai, Salem – 636 007. ... Respondent
Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.41812 of 2016 dated 29.11.2016 as per the Contempt of Court Act.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Desingu
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves punishment for willful disobedience of this Court's order in W.P.No.41812 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Periyanayagam
- respondent
Ponmudi The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd.
Coram
P.B.BALAJI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court