V.Sekar v. T. Arumugam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the respondents had complied with the previous order in W.P.No.10608 of 2021. Consequently, the court found no need for further adjudication and closed the contempt petition without awarding costs.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed with no costs awarded to either party.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.669 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Cont.P.No.669 of 2023
in W.P.No.10608 of 2021
Mr.V.Sekar
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.T. Arumugam, The Tashildar, Vandalur Taluk Office, Ottari, Peerakankaranai, Tamil Nadu- 600 048.
2.Venkatash, The Head of the surveyor, Surveyor Department, Vandalur Taluk Office, Ottari, Peerakankaranai,Tamil Nadu- 600048.
...Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of as the order under challenge has been complied with.
If compliance is established, whether adjudication on contempt charges is still required.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. V.Sekar
- respondent
T. Arumugam
- respondent
Venkatash
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court