Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of a court order to conduct a land enquiry. Respondents submitted that the enquiry was conducted and orders passed. The court closed the petition.
The contempt petition was closed after the respondent demonstrated compliance with the earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.564 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Cont.P.No.564 of 2023
D.Shanmugam
... Petitioner
Vs.
Taluk Surveyor (Land), Avadi,
Chennai – 600 054. Presently having office at Pothur Village, Modern City, Pattabiram, Chennai – 600 052.
... Respondents
Page 1 of 4
Cont.P.No.564 of 2023
Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents herein for wilful disobedience of the order dated 25.01.2022 made in W.P.No.33359 of 2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Pachaiappan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Veluchamy Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent
for non compliance of the order dated 25.01.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.33359 of 2019, thereby directing the respondent to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2019 after issuance of notice to the petitioner and counter parties and giving them an opportunity of hearing and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks.
Page 2 of 4
Cont.P.No.564 of 2023
orders on 03.07.2023. He also produced a copy of the order dated 03.07.2023
before this Court.
Government Pleader, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the petitioner aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent, he is at liberty challenge the order passed by the respondent in the manner known to law, if so advised.
19.07.2023
Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order
rts
To
Page 3 of 4
Cont.P.No.564 of 2023
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
rts
Cont.P.No.564 of 2023
19.07.2023
Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition against non-compliance of the order in W.P.No.33359 of 2019 stands allowed after the respondents filed the compliance report.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Shanmugam
Alby John Varghese, I.A.S., District Collector
M.Venkatesh, Tahsildar
Venkatesan, Taluk Surveyor (Land)
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
