S.Mohammed Akbar v. S.Abdullah,B.Sc.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a contempt petition regarding an alleged failure to appoint trustees as per a scheme decree, noting that steps were taken and the grievance was not fit for contempt proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P No.525 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Cont.P.No.525 of 2023
S.Mohammed Akbar, M/73 S/o. Sheik Hussain, No.46, Muslim Street, Udayarkudi, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore District. .....Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
S.Abdullah, Superintendent of Wakf, Wakf Board, Cuddalore Circle, No.512, Gandhi Road, Panruti 607 106 Cuddalore District. .... Respondent/3rd Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for his wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the orders of this Court made in W.P.No.24961 of 2022, dated 09.12.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Mohammed Akbar
- respondent
S.Abdullah
Coram
N.Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court